"I AM" The Resurrection

"I AM" The Resurrection

...and the Life. Though you may die...You will live.

  • AD70.NET
  • Resurrection - Visually
  • My Premises/Basis
  • Seeing Double!!!

    • 8 Dec 2011
    • 5 Responses
    •  views
    • israel jesus covenant millennialism john wesley king david kurt simmons revelation 20 satan solomon
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Someone in a private discussion group I'm a part of asked a question about Revelation 20. And strangely, the only appropriate response I felt necessary was a simple summary of my 23 part series called, "Covenant Millennialism." http://thejourney.ad70.net

    Seeing-double-title

    What follows was my answer...

    I will do my best to keep this as simple as possible...8-) I really hope I'm not tipping any holy cows with this one. I'm trusting you will be gentle with me. I've been seeing this for about a year now and can't get it out of my head.

    I've been studying all of the different millennial schemes for more than

    Read the rest of this post »

    • Tweet
  • The Resurrection - Day 005 - X Marks the Spot

    • 14 Nov 2011
    • 3 Responses
    •  views
    • alpha chiasm joshua omega
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Yes...X does mark the spot. Well...At least in Chiastic structures, this is the case. 

    If there is one thing that has become very apparent to me over the last year of studying chiastic structures in the Bible...They are everywhere from Genesis to Revelation.

    And I think it is safe to say that we may very well have unintentionally missed an explicit and key element necessary to understand the story and flow of the Biblical text.

    Another thing that has become apparent is that you can't interpret them chronologically or sequentially from left to right.

    Reading a chiasm from left to right can be done and you can get the general idea, however to intentionally ignore a chiastic structure would be to ignore

    Read the rest of this post »

    • Tweet
  • The Resurrection - Day 004

    • 13 Nov 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • chiasm dead sea scrolls hebrew bible homer new testament odyssey and iliad palendrome panama revelation
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Have you ever wondered what in the world this passage is talking about?

    Revelation 22:18-19 For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: If anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

    Would taking away or adding words to the Book of Revelation really bring serious condemnation upon those that would do such?

    I would emphatically suggest...YES!!!

    Why you ask? Because Revelation is a chiasm. It is a self verifying poetic structure that loses it's meaning if any thing is added or taken away from it. 

    If you are not familiar with this ancient form of poetry, then you may want to familiarize yourself with it before you will completely understand.

    Let me attempt to simplify this as much as possible.

    "A man a plan a canal Panama."

    The above is what is called palendrome. A palindrome is a word, phrase, number, or other sequence of units that can be read the same way in either direction, with general allowances for adjustments to punctuation and word dividers. Source: Wikipedia-Palendrome

    Here is what it would have looked like in a scroll.

    Chiasmdss

    The above photograph is of a Dead Sea Scroll containing a chiasm that is on display in the Shrine of the Book in Jerusalem. Used in ancient scripture, chiasms are a powerful, symmetric pattern of writing. This funneling structure focuses in and emphazises the main concept in the middle. Chiasms can be found all through our scriptures, but many of us are unaware of them.

    The following is Wikipedia's definition of Chiastic Structure.

    Chiastic structure (also called chiastic pattern or ring structure) is a literary device for chiasmus applied to narrative motifs, turns of phrase, or whole passages. Various structures of chiasmus are commonly seen in ancient literature to emphasize, parallel, or contrast concepts or ideas. Examples of chiastic structures are the A,B,C...C,B,A pattern and the ABBAABB…ABBA pattern. Chiastic structure s are sometimes called palistrophes, chiasms, symmetric structures, ring structures, or concentric structures.

    These often symmetrical patterns are commonly found in ancient literature such as the epic poetry of Odyssey and Iliad. Various chiastic structures are also seen in the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament, where biblical writers used chiasmus to give meaning to their writings or to highlight details of particular importance.

    This should be enough to get your head moving in the right direction. Please feel free to ask any questions you might have for me in the comment section below. Wikipedia-Chiastic Structure

    Michael J Loomis

     

    • Tweet
  • The Resurrection - Day 003

    • 11 Nov 2011
    • 3 Responses
    •  views
    • 1 corinthians 15 bible bodily resurrection bryan davis greek preterist radio so what now what now
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Here we are at Day 003 of The Resurrection...8-)

    --Business first...

    Over the next few days I will be crafting a short description of my underlying presuppositions that have led me to see things the way I am seeing them now. It will be a permanent page linked above just below the header section.

    Also...I would really like to get as much feedback as possible all along the way. What I'm seeing is a general framework that I believe better fits the Biblical narrative and does a better job of answering the question I am asked most, "What now?"

    That is, when I was a premillennial dispensationalist I had a certain fearful expectation that motivated me. It was a false expectation...But nonetheless it was motivating.

    Coming to an understanding of fulfillment took that misplaced expectation away, but it caused that lingering question. "So what now?"

    In all actuality very little changed in how I practiced my faith. But that same question that I was asking is the same one I now hear most frequently.

    And so I'm hoping that as you follow along you will begin to see why I think this is important enough to dedicate a whole website to it.

    --Where I'm at in the process...

    I'm just about finished up with my first pass through the Greek text of 1 Corinthians 15. I'm not a Greek scholar by any sense. But I did have 3 semesters of Greek in school. So basically I know just enough to be dangerous.

    One thing that has jumped off the page at me is just how much more precise the Greek text is compared to most of our modern and popular translations. This I will explain in the coming days.

    Another thing that has really been a paradigm shifter is chiasm's throughout the Biblical text. Not just 1 Corinthians 15. 

    My studies in chiasm have been a very fruitful part of my friendship with Bryan Davis. If you are not familiar with Bryan, he and I do a weekly broadcast on Monday mornings at 9 AM Pacific, where we discuss chiasm's throughout the Bible. 

    I believe we've done precisely 43, 1 hour broadcasts on the topic. Here are the links to both pages on the Preterist Radio Podcast Page. The series began on November 09, 2010.

    Page 1

    Page 2

    All of Bryan's written work on the topic...Which is voluminous, is available at http://chiasm.ad70.net

    Anyhow...Back to work.

    See you tomorrow...8-)

    Mike

    • Tweet
  • The Resurrection - Day 002

    • 10 Nov 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • bodily resurrection christianity 101 dust earth egypt jesus paul restoration resurrection solomon
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Another response from an email conversation. Some more of my non-systematic thoughts being drawn together.
    -----------
    And out of Egypt I called My Son. Israel or Jesus? Both and...One and the same.

    Hebrews 10:7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

    Jesus fulfilled the things regarding the flesh. We partake in the Spirit. Jesus' physical body was the only one that could and had to fulfill the requirements of the flesh. 

    So we don't have to. Christianity 101.

    Certain interpretations of the scripture might require a bodily resurrection of those in Christ, but the scriptures certainly

    Read the rest of this post »

    • Tweet
  • The Resurrection - Day 001

    • 10 Nov 2011
    • 1 Response
    •  views
    • 1 corinthians 15 greek resurrection
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    The following is a response to a question I was asked by a friend about the resurrection. 

    Recently I've been spending quite a bit of time in 1 Corinthians 15, examining the Greek. I will be sharing my thoughts here as I continue to develop this understanding of, "The Resurrection."

    -----------------------------

    I don't have any problem with what Alan stated. And even at the least...In a spiritual sense, I'm sure you too would agree.

    See Ephesians 2 below.

    And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins...God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.

    Clearly not to be interpreted with a wooden sense of literalism. Maybe you would call this the already but not yet aspect of the resurrection in Christ. Or even today when someone is born again...Regeneration.

    The following is by no means a systematic treatment but something more along the lines of theological musing.

    I believe we as preterist's have a much broader definition of what the resurrection was, is and will be. I personally see it as a singular thing that is part and parcel with Christ's Parousia, reign and Kingdom. His birth into this world, His presence that came in the first century...His Advent. He came to fulfill Israel's prophecies. He WAS Israel planted in the ground, to be raised back up to life. Jesus fulfilled Israel's hope in resurrection.

    See Ezekiel 36:9-11 below.

    For indeed I am for you, and I will turn to you, and you shall be tilled and sown. I will multiply men upon you, all the house of Israel, all of it; and the cities shall be inhabited and the ruins rebuilt. I will multiply upon you man and beast; and they shall increase and bear young; I will make you inhabited as in former times, and do better for you than at your beginnings. Then you shall know that I am the LORD.

    Israel's hope in resurrection(restoration) was deeply seated in the idea of National restoration. One Nation under God. Pun somewhat intended.

    However those who put their faith and trust in walls instead of God found their fiery demise in their false Earthly Nationalistic idea of restoration. Those that wanted the physical kingdom died in and with that physical kingdom. 

    Jesus came to restore/resurrect Israel and He did not fail in His mission. He brought the Kingdom. However it was not of this world. Those that had eyes to see and ears to hear entered in. 

    Israel's divided kingdom was restored/resurrected in Christ. This is the past and fulfilled aspect of the resurrection. And was fulfilled in the gospel having BEEN preached to every nation and creature under the heavens. 

    There is the the present active aspect of the resurrection, which is what I personally believe Paul was defending in 1 Corinthians 15. The present active aspect is what most would refer to as regeneration in a living breathing human beings life here on planet Earth.

    And yet if I'm understanding the Greek properly in 1 Corinthians 15 there was still a future aspect(HOPE) that Paul was looking towards as yet to be fulfilled. That is that All Israel would be saved. See Ezek. 36 & Romans 11.

    I believe that Paul understood that he was participating in carrying out the present/active aspect of the resurrection through the preaching of the gospel to "ALL" the nations/Ethnos/tribes.

    Israel's National restoration was not an Earthly one. It was a heavenly one. Or a Heavenly country as Hebrews 11 tells us.

    So I think some of the confusion between the preterist and futurist is that Paul speaks of all three aspects in 1 Corinthians 15. 

    The resurrection was past, present and future from Paul's perspective.

    Paul said, death was defeated, death was being defeated, and death would be defeated. He also said he died daily and that they were being renewed daily. 

    Hebrews tells us Jesus appeared(past), was appearing(present), and would appear again(future).

    Jesus said that "He is the resurrection and the life."

    Jesus is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

    Are we alive in Christ? Yes. Will we still die? Yes. But our hope lies in the fact that though we may die...We will live again. And so we too will participate in every aspect of the resurrection, past, present, and future. 

    Jesus was old covenant Israel buried in the ground and raised back to life. Past. 
    Those that were accepting Jesus as their Messiah were being made alive even though they would still die. Present
    And they would and we will too live again, beyond this life on Earth. Future. Absent from the body, present with the Lord.

    What does any of it look like after we die? I don't know. The dust will return to the earth as it was and the spirit will return to God who gave it. I fully expect it will be way better than anything we can imagine. 

    I personally believe that the resurrection cannot be simply limited to or explained as something simply past, present or future. To deny one part of it is to deny all of it. Including Jesus' part in it, leaving you dead in trespasses and sins. I believe that this is what Paul was dealing with regarding Hymenaeus & Philetus and 1 Corinthians 15.

    Preterist in general believe in all three aspects of it. Some Hyper-Preterist's deny any future aspect of it. And some deny future and even present aspects of it. I believe the latter two might have mill stones around their necks.

    Futurists in general, tend to focus heavily on the future aspect of it with a general acknowledgment of the present aspect of it. But they deny the past aspect of it.

    The past aspect of the resurrection is the physical/bodily aspect of death that was overcome by Christ. The present aspect is regeneration and renewing of our faith. The future aspect is that, though we will die. We will live again. The spirit returns to God who gave it.

    I personally believe that all aspects of the resurrection will be fully realized once I'm in that place where I am living again after I die and my physical body goes back to the dust. 

    I will do my best to send you an email, podcast or video to let you know what it's like...8-)

    I know that this response might get me in trouble with some preterist's. But this is just the way I see it today.

    Yes we have a future hope. But it's only because of old covenant Israel's hope having been fulfilled.

    I personally believe that if old covenant Israel's hope was not fulfilled and their part in God's salvific plan is yet to be fulfilled, then we as gentiles have no hope in anything past, present or future. Our faith is in vain and Christ isn't even risen.

     

    • Tweet
  • About

    My thoughts on, "I AM...The Resurrection."

    1292 Views
  • Archive

    • 2011 (6)
      • December (1)
      • November (5)

    Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterTwitterFacebookVimeoYoutube
  • Sites I Like

    • Preterist Archive
    • AD70 Chat
    • AD70 Podcasts
    • AD70 Radio
    • AD70 T.V.